Legal Opinion

Catlett v. Stokes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hamlin County. Hon. George H. Marquis, Judge. Action by .Joseph W. Catlett against William H. Stokes. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, as mortgagee, of certain wheat, to recover the value of portions thereof sold and delivered by the mortgagor to the defendant. Verdict and judgment being in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed. The facts necessary to a proper understanding of the questions presented on this appeal may be briefly stated as follows: In August, 1892, one Neil Cassidy, being indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $6,000, executed to him a promissory note for that sum payable January 1, 1893, and which note was subsequently extended to November 1, 18931 In order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weigel v. Powers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Citizens National Bank v. Osborne-McMillan Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sand v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Catlett v. StokesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Nielsen v. WarnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API