Sheffield v. Leech
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
The record in this case shows thpt at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, in response to defendant’s motion therefor, the court directed a verdict for defendant. Upon the trial, the court ruled that D. M. Leech was incompetent under art. 3716, the Dead Man’s Statute, to testify to certain conversations between himself and his deceased parents. Whether this ruling was correct is the principal question to be determined on this appeal. In order to de*790termine whether or not the Dead Man’s Statute has any application, and whether D. M. Leech was a party incompetent to testify…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- O'Brien v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Kettler v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968