Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. Leech

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1949No. 12082PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

The record in this case shows thpt at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, in response to defendant’s motion therefor, the court directed a verdict for defendant. Upon the trial, the court ruled that D. M. Leech was incompetent under art. 3716, the Dead Man’s Statute, to testify to certain conversations between himself and his deceased parents. Whether this ruling was correct is the principal question to be determined on this appeal. In order to de*790termine whether or not the Dead Man’s Statute has any application, and whether D. M. Leech was a party incompetent to testify…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. O'Brien v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Kettler v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API