Legal Opinion
Borg-Warner Corporation v. Mall Tool Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 1955No. 11032PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, owner of patent to Hassler, No. 2,326,854, issued August 17, 1943, charged defendant with infringement of claims 1, 2, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, and 14. The Court found claims 1 and 2 valid and infringed by exhibits 5 and 6, devices produced by defendant, but not infringed by exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4, likewise manufactured by defendant, concluding that the claims properly construed did not cover the latter mentioned devices, but adding that, if claims 1 and 2 should be read as the plaintiff contended they should be, then exhibits 1, 2, 3, and 4 do infringe. The Court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Idas B. White, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Martin v. Ford Alexander CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Bela Seating Company v. Poloron Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Borg-Warner-Corporation v. Mall Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.