Harper v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
Harper & Collins (Harper) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s order granting Rachel Brown’s review petition and amending a supplemental agreement between Harper and Brown to provide for continuing partial disability benefits under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. On August 12, 1991, Brown suffered a work-related injury in the nature of bilateral mild tendonitis while in the course of her employment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Visintin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- McGraw-Edison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- General Dynamics, Land Systems Division v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996