Legal Opinion

Harper v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

Harper & Collins (Harper) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s order granting Rachel Brown’s review petition and amending a supplemental agreement between Harper and Brown to provide for continuing partial disability benefits under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. On August 12, 1991, Brown suffered a work-related injury in the nature of bilateral mild tendonitis while in the course of her employment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Visintin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. McGraw-Edison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. General Dynamics, Land Systems Division v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API