Franklin v. Franklin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
(after stating the facts). The chancellor was right, for reasons considered at length in Porter v. Landis, 329 Mich 76, in holding that the deed created an entirety tenancy and that its designation of the grantees as husband and wife is not under these pleadings open to contradiction.
The principal cases on which defendants rely are readily distinguishable. Wright v. Kaynor, 150 Mich 7, presented the instance of a deed which did not describe or designate the 2 grantees as husband and wife. In McNitt v. McNitt, 230 Mich 303, no written instrument was produced or involved; the claim being one of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Wright v. KaynorMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Collins v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Porter v. LandisMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Cristia v. CristiaMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniels v. DanielMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Emmons v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- St. Pierre v. Estate of St. PierreMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- St. Pierre v. Estate of St. PierreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Daniels v. DanielMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.