Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Muratoski

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 8, 2005No. 04-CR-179-SMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

United States v. Muratoski 04-CR-179-SM 04/08/05 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America v. Case No. 04-cr-179-SM Opinion No.

2005 DNH 061

Adil Muratoski O R D E R Defendant moves to transfer venue in this criminal case to the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago ) , where he lives and works. For the reasons set forth below, that motion is granted. Standard of Review A district court has broad discretionary power to transfer a criminal prosecution to another district "for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice."…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. John Dillard O'BryantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Hon. John M. Cashin, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. SalinasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API