Criswell v. Ginsberg & Foreman

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

The trial court ordered appellant, Harold W. Criswell, to turn over a cause of action Criswell asserted against R.M. Ginsberg, individually, to Ginsberg & Foreman 1 in partial satisfaction of a judgment Ginsberg & Foreman held against Criswell. Criswell asserts the trial court abused its discretion because the court’s application of section 31.002 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code 2 is unconstitutional as applied to him in this case. We agree. We set aside the trial court’s turnover order. We render judgment that Ginsberg & Foreman take nothing.

FACTUAL AND…