Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1996Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mazzarelli, J. (dissenting in part and concurring in part).

I agree with the majority that the Executive Deputy Commissioner committed errors of law to the extent that he found that Federal law preempts various claims at issue in these proceedings. However, as explained below, I dissent from those portions of the majority opinion which, in my view, disregard the substantial evidence of sex, age and disability discrimination committed by Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta).

These two Executive Law § 298 proceedings were transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. State Division of Human Rights v. Xerox Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Ebasco Services Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API