Legal Opinion

Seago v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal -in error from tbe judgment of tbe Law Court of Chattanooga, November Term, 1870. John B. Hoyl, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of the court.

Martin placed 2,600 bushels of corn in the warehouse of French & Brown, at Chattanooga, who, after selling parts of it to various persons, shipped about sis hundred bushels thereof to Seago, who was a commission merchant at Atlanta, in compliance with his request made by letter or telegraph. French & Brown were indebted to Seago at the time in a sum sufficient to pay for the corn, but afterwards failed in *309business. They paid to Martin the entire proceeds of their sales, with the exception of the six hundred bushels received by Seago. On the trial…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bagley & Co. v. Union-Buffalo Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  2. Jones v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API