Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scaglione v. Juneau

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 2010No. 2010-CA-1048Published

1DissentMurray, J.

| ^Although the trial court granted the defendant’s exception of peremption, the more appropriate peremptory exception is nonjoinder of a necessary party, which the defendant also filed. Nonjoinder is one of the peremptory exceptions listed in La. C.C.P. art. 927(A). The plaintiffs acknowledge in their brief that they did not sue the proper party defendant. They acknowledge that the Election Code provides that the Secretary of State is a necessary party in a suit, such as this one, challenging the eligibility of a candidate for elected office. La. R.S. 18:1402 A(2). However, as the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Naghi v. BrenerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. Touchet v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. Plaquemines Parish Council v. PetrovichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Nicholson v. GrisaffeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Burch v. McClendonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API