Legal Opinion
Dobeckmun Co. v. Boston Packaging MacHinery Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 1, 1956No. Civ. A. 54-944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
This is a suit for an injunction 1 under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq., and Mass.Gen.Laws (Ter.Ed.) Ch. 110, § 7A, as added by St.1947, c. 307. The plaintiff is an Ohio manufacturer of cellophane products, notably an opening tape hereinafter described. The tape is sold in interstate commerce in Massachusetts. The defendant is a local manufacturer of packaging machinery. Jurisdiction is asserted under 15 U.S.C.A. § 1121 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1338. I find all jurisdictional requisites.
Since 1937 the plaintiff has been manufacturing a narrow laminated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Food Fair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Globe Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pignons S. A. De Mecanique De Precision v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Skil Corp. v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958