Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dipoma v. McPhie

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 4, 2000No. 990526-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge:

T1 Appellant, Mary Ann Lucero Dipoma, appeals from the trial court's dismissal of her action for failure to properly file her complaint with the required filing fee within the applicable statute of limitation period. We conclude Dipoma's action was timely filed and, therefore, reverse.

BACKGROUND 1

12 On November 24, 1997, Dipoma filed a pro se complaint against Brian McPhie seeking damages for injuries she sustained in a traffic accident on November 29, 1998. At the time she filed the complaint, Dipoma submitted a personal check for payment of the filing fee.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parissi v. Telechron, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Theola A. Jarrett v. Us Sprint Communications CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. De-Gas, Inc. v. Midland ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hart v. Salt Lake County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dipoma v. McPhieUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Atkinson v. Stateline Hotel Casino & ResortCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. Clark v. ArcherUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. Brixen & Christopher Architects, P.C. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API