Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1952No. Civ. 8116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is a proceeding through writ of review whereby it is sought to annul an award of the respondent Industrial Accident Commission. The facts may be summarized as follows: Beaster and Cooper Logging Company was engaged in logging operations in Reeves Canyon, 12 to 15 miles south and west of Willits in Mendocino County. Roland Soward had been in its employ a number of months. He was a mechanic and because he was given to drinking sprees which disabled him from working he was employed and paid on an hourly basis from time to time as he was in condition to work and his help was needed. He and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Auto Lite Battery Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Sullivan v. MattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API