Legal Opinion

Lapidus v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 2, 1958No. 55 C 481PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOCH, District Judge.

This action having been tried by the Court without a jury, the Court having had the benefit of argument of counsel on briefs, being fully advised in the premises, on the whole case, makes the following:

Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiffs are individuals and citizens of the State of Illinois engaged in the business of buying and selling perishable commodities at wholesale in the City of Chicago, Illinois.

2. Defendant and its connecting carriers are common carriers by rail performing transportation services for hire in interstate commerce between points in the States of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. Bianco v. Texas Instruments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. F. J. McCarty Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
  4. Shippers Service Company, a Partnership v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API