Opinion No. (1994)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney General Loving has asked me to respond to your request for an Attorney General Opinion regarding whether any restrictions are attached to real estate purchased with bond proceeds. Because your questions may be answered by reference to controlling statutes and case law, this office has determined your request should be answered through this informal letter. The discussion which follows is not an official opinion of the Attorney General. Rather, the following analysis and conclusions, while solely my own, have been reached after careful research of the questions you have raised. After…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.