Legal Opinion

McSpedon v. Kunz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These two actions were brought by plaintiff'-wife to recover from the retailer, the wholesaler and the packer for injuries sustained as a result of eating pork chops infected with trichinae, and by the husband for the expenses incurred and loss of his wife’s services. The complaints alleged negligence on the part of the packer and breach of warranty on the part of the dealer and wholesaler. The dealer served a cross-bill against the wholesaler and the latter served a cross-bill against the packer. Both actions were tried together. After trial, judgment based on breach of warranty was directed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haller v. RudmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Dressler v. Merkel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API