Legal Opinion

Tiensuu v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1980No. 13183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Judge.

Defendant appealed from the judgment awarding plaintiff penalties and attorney’s fees under La.R.S. 23:632.

The sole issue is the propriety of that award. We reverse.

Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with defendant for the 1977-1978 academic year. A provision of the contract stated:

“All appointments are subject to applicable policies and regulations of the Southern University Board of Supervisors and all employees are expected to adhere to Board and/or administrative policies as they relate to them.”

The university had established certain check-out procedures for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hays v. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Com'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Harrison v. First National Funeral Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Harrison v. First National Funeral Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clifton Richardson v. Southern University Sheila R. Evans Ericka CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Richardson v. Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Tiensuu v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API