Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Discount Corp. v. Shepherd

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2007No. 77974-1Published

1Dissent

¶18 (dissenting) — The majority’s perfunctory discussion of RCW 6.17.020 is contrary to the legislature’s intent and wholly at odds with bedrock principles concerning the rights of an assignee. Therefore, ! dissent.

Madsen, J.

¶19 At the time American Discount Corporation assigned the judgment against Joy and W. Austin Shepherd to United Collection Service, RCW 6.17.020 provided that a *101party or assignee could execute on a judgment for 10 years from the entry of the judgment. The statute also provided that “a party in whose favor a judgment has been rendered” could extend the judgment for an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API