Schermerhorn v. . Talman
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
The claimant based his claim for relief in the supreme court upon several grounds: First. That the arrangement of 11th July, 1838, was infected with usury; Second. That it was void for want of power in the American Life Insurance and Trust Company, under its charter, to issue the certificates of deposit mentioned in the pleadings and proofs; and Lastly. That the issuing of these certificates was, under the circumstances, a violation of the laws of this state relating to unauthorized banking. That court pronounced the judgment appealed from, on the assumption that the arrangement referred to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nellis v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Yates v. FootCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1814
- Seaman v. StoughtonNew York Court of Chancery · 1848