Legal Opinion

Gaiser v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion county; the Hon. Albert M. Rose, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shirley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee’s declaration containing three counts alleged in substance he was possessed of tracts of land adjoining on both sides a natural watercourse known as Crooked Creek; that appellant’s right of way extended along immediately west of and adjoining said land; that appellant had built and maintained a dam or embankment across the bed of said creek upon its premises, and below said land without any opening to permit the free passage of water and causing it to remain upon the lands in large quantities; that prior to the erection…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ThillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Chicago North Shore Street Railway Co. v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Strange v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  4. Hart v. Wabash Southern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deterding v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API