Legal Opinion

Strobridge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2009No. 4D08-644PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in which he raised four claims. We conclude that they are all legally insufficient and fail to show prejudice. Nevertheless, our affirmance is without prejudice to his filing an amended claim alleging a failure to convey a plea offer.

As to appellant’s claim that his attorney failed to communicate a plea offer from the state, the motion is legally insufficient, because his pleading is ambiguous as to whether any plea offer was ever extended. He also does not allege the terms of any plea offer. However,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Carratelli v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Mancino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Melvin L. Pryear v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Abdallah v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API