Legal Opinion

Jones v. Mencik

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 23, 1923No. 2900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court, dismissing complaint on the ground that the written instrument on which it was based was not proved. The complainants are engaged in business as brokers in New York City and are members of the New York Cotton Exchange, and the defendant Mencik is a resident of Hohenelbe, Austria-Hungary, now part of Czecho-Slovakia. The action was brought to recover losses sustained by complainants on marginal transactions in cotton and was based on an alleged contract between them. Oh June 25, 1915, complainants, on an order from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. Linol Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grant v. Kellogg Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Vick Chemical Co. v. Thomas Kerfoot & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  3. Perkins v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API