Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Bixby

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendants solely on the theory that as partners of Richard E. Alt (Dr. Alt), a physician who died in 1975, they were liable for Dr. Alt’s negligent treatment of the plaintiff Edwin S. Van Dyke (Van Dyke). In this appeal the defendants argue that the admissible evidence did not warrant a finding that a partnership existed and that, if a partnership did exist, there was no evidence warranting a finding that Dr. Alt failed, during the period of the partnership, to treat Van Dyke in conformity with the requirements of accepted medical practice.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Beeler v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Bachand v. VidalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Ainslie v. AinslieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Bagley v. Wonderland Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. ElyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Hopkins v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. In Re Dissolution & Winding Up of KeyTronicsNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Drivas v. BarnettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Kulas v. WebberMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API