Hughes v. Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Daniels, J., at May Term, 1911, of AlamaNCE. Civil action, brought to recover on certain policies of insurance issued by defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Daniels, J., at May Term, 1911, of AlamaNCE. Civil action, brought to recover on certain policies of insurance issued by defendant. These issues were submitted to the jury: 1. Did the defendant, through its agents, represent to plaintiffs that it could, and would, issue to said plaintiffs insurance policies on their lives and upon the lives of their children, with provisions therein stipulated that at the end of ten years from dates thereof the plaintiffs might withdraw the whole amount of premiums paid in, with 4 per cent interest thereon? Answer: Yes. 2. If so, were suck…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee OubiaM.
A careful examination of tke record in reference to tke twenty assignments of error discloses no substantial error committed upon tke trial.
Tkere is no material respect in wkick tkis case differs" from tke several cases brougkt by tkis defendant to tkis Court kere-tofore. Caldwell v. Insurance Co., 140 N. C., 100; Sykes v. Insurance Co., 148 N. C., 13; Stroud v. Insurance Co., 148 N. C., 54; Whitehurst v. Insurance Co., 149 N. C., 273; Jones v. Insurance Co., 151 N. C., 54; Jones v. Insurance Co., 153 N. C., 388; Briggs v. Insurance Co., 70 S. E., 1068.
We do not tkink tke subject…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Caldwell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Sykes v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Stroud v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Jones v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.