Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 14, 2012No. A-10487Published

1DissentBolger, J.

I disagree with the decision to address the issue identified in the lead opinion, because Jones failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. At the time Jones made his motion for a transport order, he did not make any showing that he had material testimony to offer on the issue he now relies upon.

Jones's amended application for post-conviction relief alleged that his trial attorney committed several acts of malpractice, including negligent handling of Jones's mental health issues, failure to notify Jones that he could appeal a motion to withdraw his plea of no contest, and failure to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Interest of FHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Khan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Richard B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Pease v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API