Nixon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an adverse final judgment, rendered after a non jury trial.
The judgment comes here with a presumption of correctness, and the burden is on appellant to clearly demonstrate error by the trial court. We believe he has failed to do this; and a detailed exposition of the facts and legal contentions would be of slight precedential value to the bar or to the law of the state.
Suffice it to say that appellant’s principal contention is that the liability policy in question was ambiguous, that such ambiguity should have been…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Nixon v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Thomas v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Continental Assurance Co. v. KurtzerCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1988