Legal Opinion

Boone County v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court Brice B. Hudgins, Judge. Mitcliell and others sued Boone county on a claim for fees of officers and witnesses incurred in a prosecution for an assault with intent to commit, rape, a felony case, wherein the accused was convicted of an assault and battery. It was agreed that the accused had no property out of which the costs of the prosecution could be made.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Boone Circuit Court Brice B. Hudgins, Judge. Mitcliell and others sued Boone county on a claim for fees of officers and witnesses incurred in a prosecution for an assault with intent to commit, rape, a felony case, wherein the accused was convicted of an assault and battery. It was agreed that the accused had no property out of which the costs of the prosecution could be made. The county court disallowed the claim, and an appeal was taken to the circuit court, which allowed it. The county has appealed. The county is not liable. Sand. & H. Dig., §§ 2259, 2316; 44 Ark. 33; Suth.…

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Where a defendant, indicted for a felony, is tried and acquitted of the felony, but convicted of a misdemeanor of the same generic class included in the indictment, the county is liable for costs if the defendant has no property out of which a judgment for costs can be made. Section 2316, Sand. & H. Dig. Such is the case presented by this record.

Affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API