Legal Opinion

Latham Co. v. Snell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1915No. 8155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Eastland County Court; C. A. Hill, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Ranger against W. H. Snell, in which the defendant asked that Latham Company and another be made parties defendant. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant Snell, and in favor of that defendant against the Lath-am Company, and the Latham Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

The First National Bank of Ranger instituted this suit against W. H. Snell in the county court to recover an indebtedness alleged to be due on a promissory note for the sum of $258, bearing interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from its date and executed by said Snell on the 10th day of January, 1911, and maturing in the fall of that year. The plaintiff also sought to foreclose a mortgage lien given to secure the note on two mules and a set of harness- described in the petition. The note was made payable to Latham Company at Eastland, Tex., and indorsed “Latham Co. without recourse.”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clegg v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Love v. KeowneTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. SimcockTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Dickerson v. San Antonio, U. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BufkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Womack v. Hastings & LagowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API