Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Barlow

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

This is an action to recover damages for'personal injuries and for the loss .of an automobile sustained at a grade crossing by a collision between an automobile driven by' the defendant in error and a freight train operated by the plaintiff in error. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below; the railway company assigns error. The parties will be referred to in the positions they occupied in the trial court. \

The physical facts at and around the crossing are 'as follows. The right of way of the defendant company extends approximately east and west, with the public highway *865crossi…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Peters v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Payne v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Hook v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Etheridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. BrughSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. Powell v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Harris v. HowertonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  5. Leath v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API