Hayden v. Filippone
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Suit by Roeco Filippone and another against James R. Hayden to recover premises from the defendant as a tenant at sufferance. Judgment for the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court of the District, on appeal from the municipal court, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
The Filippones filed a complaint in the municipal court, in which they alleged that their grantors had rented the described premises to Hayden as a tenant at sufferance, that they had served 30 days’ notice on him to vacate the property, and that he had refused to do so. The municipal court gave them judgment, and Hayden appealed to the Supreme Court of the District. As provided by the nineteenth rule of that court, the Filippones filed an affidavit of merit, which set up the facts on which they based their action. A copy of the notice served on Hayden was attached to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boss v. HaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
- Lehker v. JoyceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Smith v. PyneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beyer v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- McCoy v. DuehayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- Phillips v. Moore & Hill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922