Thomas E. Briscoe v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant moves for reversal on the record. The Government objects on the merits, but not to the propriety of a final disposition.
The complete record, which is now before us, clearly demonstrates that, at the sentencing hearing, the District Court erred in refusing to entertain appellant’s oral motion to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. Poole v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C.-, 250 F.2d 396; Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d), 47, 18 U.S.C.A. Moreover, the record also discloses ample basis for trial upon that issue. Statement of Judge Bazelon upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William L. Poole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Thomas E. Briscoe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- John A. Gearhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- State v. DeutschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- George A. Watts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Anderson Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Anderson Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959