Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Ross
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1931No. 433PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
A creditor of the bankrupt appeals from an order of the trial court granting a discharge. The appellant contends that the evidence conclusively shows that the bankrupt, within a year prior to the filing of the petition, transferred his property “with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud his creditors.” 11 USCA § 32 (b) (4). There is no substantial dispute as to the facts.
The bankrupt was an honest straightforward young farmer who made a persistent but unsuccessful effort to get out of debt. He owned personal property of the value of about $2,500. All of it was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In re Julius Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Sargent v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hultman v. TevisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Rutter v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- In Re BeckmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934
- Epperly v. Mercantile Trust & S. Bank of Quincy, Ill.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- In Re NemerovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.