Legal Opinion

Hoefer v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1911No. 2137PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original application by Hoefer to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus against the Commissioner of the General Land Office.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brown

On the 33d day of March 1903, W. P. lams filed his application in the General Land Office to purchase section 36, block 1, T. T. & R. R. Co., as a home and to purchase section 18, block 7, T. T. & N. O. Co., as additional land, both sections situated in Dallam County. The Commissioner oí the General Land Office awarded both sections to lams, who executed his obligation, made payments and did all the things necessary to be done to complete his purchase. Having resided upon the land as required by law for three years, and having paid all interest and made all- other payments that the law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brightman v. Comanche CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Chambers v. Robison, CommissionerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lovett v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API