Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of Elray and Jean Rash, Debtor. Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash and Jean E. Rash

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1996No. 93-5396PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge,

with whom REYNALDO G. GARZA, DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

The majority dismantles 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) (1994) by combining a question-begging interpretation of the statute’s first sentence with an unreasonably restrictive reading of the second. Having thereby obscured the section’s plain meaning, the majority turns to an inapposite presumption, an incorrect economic analysis, and the last resort of judicial redrafting — selective reading of the legislative history. Not surprisingly, this policy-driven reconstruction…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Elray and Jean Rash, Debtor. Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash and Jean E. RashCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API