Legal Opinion
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Van Dusen Harrington Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 5, 1929No. 1756PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
The question to be determined is the effect of a mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals in this case. Van Dusen Harrington Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 32 F.(2d) 466, 470.
The action was brought to recover charges alleged to be due for reeonsighment of carloads of grain from Minneapolis, Minn., under a tariff of rules and charges filed by the plaintiff, governing the diversion or reconsignment of carload freight. The tariff provided, among other things, that notice of arrival should be sent or given to the consignee. This court found in favor of the plaintiff and that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Redfield v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cleveland Rolling Mill v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thornton v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Franklin Discount Co. v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Herzberg's, Inc. v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Harding v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Lumbermen's Trust Co. v. Town of RyegateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.