Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Turley v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1990No. CA CR 89-301Published

1ConcurrenceJames R. Cooper, Judge

An issue not argued, but which arose in our conference, concerns the proper disposition of a case where a conviction is reversed because the trial court erroneously failed to instruct the jury on a lesser-included offense. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the greater offense of which the appellant was convicted was not challenged on appeal. The only relief requested by the appellant was a new trial. This is the relief granted in the majority opinion.

The dissent maintains that we can and should modify the judgment appealed from in this case and fix punishment in conformity with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Milburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Henson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API