Legal Opinion

State v. Noyce

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 27, 2015No. 111660PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

David Noyce appeals the district court’s summaiy denial of his pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence under K.S.A. 22-3504. He challenges his murder conviction as multiplicitous and for the first time on appeal argues his sentence is unconstitutional under Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. _, 133 S. Ct. 2151, 186 L. Ed. 2d 314 (2013) (sentencing scheme permitting judge to find aggravating circumstances necessary to impose increased mandatory sentence unconstitutional). We affirm.

This court has previously held that a multiplicity issue…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. Van CleaveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. State v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. SartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Noyce v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API