Legal Opinion

Sylvan Mortgage Co. v. Astruck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The parties have stipulated that no receipt of rent shall affect the question which the parties have submitted for decision, namely, whether the lease, by its terms, entitled the tenant to a renewal as a matter of law. The notice by letter was given in sufficient time.

There appears to be no ambiguity in the clause in question and hence no room for construction on the ground of uncertainty, or for the implication of covenants not expressed. (McCluskey v. Cromwell, 11 N. Y. 593, 601.)

In the case at bar the parties had before them a lease which contained provisions for renewal at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Bernstein v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bernstein v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chamber of Commerce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. A. S. J. Building Co. v. DeixelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  3. Chamber of Commerce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. Earlington Realty Corp. v. NeschisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1925
  5. Sylvan Mortgage Co. v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API