Pennie v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Justice.
Appellant Ntyono Pennie and co-defendant Torrence Sanders were convicted of the felony murder of Shirley Akins and other offenses.1 Appellant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to request a detailed jury charge on proximate causation. We affirm.
1. In our previous decision affirming Sanders’s conviction, we *250summarized the evidence as follows:
Viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that Sanders and... [Appellant] drove to an apartment complex in a [b] lack Nissan Maxima and approached an acquaintance, Danny Rakestraw, who was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Long v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Westmoreland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Flournoy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Stafford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Benson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Whiting v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.