Perry v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OVERTON, Senior Judge.
In the trial court, appellant, utilizing the procedure approved in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), entered pleas of guilty to grand larceny and to breaking and entering. Appellant contends that because the Commonwealth’s evidence failed to prove the structure allegedly entered was a structure permanently affixed to realty or other structure included in Code §§ 18.2-90 and 18.2-91, the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to convict him of breaking and entering pursuant to his Alford plea. We hold that appellant waived…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Savino v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Dowell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Dowell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Cortese v. BlackDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carroll v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Parson v. CarrollSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Cobbins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Jonta Ramsey v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.