Legal Opinion
Bean v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 28, 2019No. 0601/17Published
1Opinion of the Court
Anthony Bean v. State of Maryland, No. 601, Sept. Term 2017 Opinion by Leahy, J. Motion to Suppress Out-of-Court Identification > Due Process > State Action To ameliorate the risk of an incorrect identification, criminal defendants may invoke the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to combat “the introduction of evidence of, or tainted by, unreliable pretrial identifications obtained through unnecessarily suggestive procedures.” Webster v. State,
299 Md. 581, 599-600
(1984) (quoting Moore v Illinois,
434 U.S. 220, 227
(1977)). A criminal defendant must first demonstrate, however, that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State of Tennessee v. Rhakim MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- O'CONNELL v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.