Legal Opinion

Romeiro v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1985No. 84-2104Published

1Opinion of the Court

773 F.2d 1021

Pedro M. ROMEIRO De SILVA, also known as Pedro M. De

Romeiro, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

William F. SMITH, U.S. Attorney; Alan Nelson, Commissioner

of I & NS; Ernest E. Gustafson, District

Director; Phoenix, Office of I & NS,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 84-2104.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 12, 1985.

Decided Oct. 7, 1985.

Marshall G. Whitehead, DePrima, Anderson & Whitehead, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard K. Willard, Richard M. Evans, Morris H. Deutsch, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. John Winston Ono Lennon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. George Bernard Nicholas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API