Legal Opinion

Winsten v. Prichard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 29, 1979No. 6670-1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of Gail and Judith Prichard establishing their right to a 5-foot easement across the property of August and Donnabelle Winsten.

Title to the Prichard and Winsten property was previously held by O. S. Buehler, who subdivided his land into 15 lots. In 1967, Buehler sold lots 12 through 15 to the Winstens' predecessors in interest by a real estate contract which stated that the land was

[fjree of encumbrances, except: a non-exclusive easement across the . . . South 5 ft of the above described property for ingress, egress and utilities.

Exhib…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Netherlands American Mortgage Bank v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Loose v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kemery v. MylroieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green v. LupoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Lake Arrowhead Community Club, Inc. v. LooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Cameron Pelly And Amy Pelly, Res. v. Anatoliy Panasyuk And Sharon C.w. Tseng, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Heg v. AlldredgeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Olson v. TrippelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API