State v. Sipe
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from, Neosho District Court. On March 31,1887, the county attorney of Neosho county filed the following information (omitting caption and verification ) against Morgan K. Sipe, in the office of the clerk of the district court of that county: “And now comes J. L. Denison, county attorney of Neosho county, in the state of Kansas, who prosecutes for and on behalf of the state of Kansas, in the district court in and for said county and state, and gives the court to…
Read the full summary
Appeal from, Neosho District Court. On March 31,1887, the county attorney of Neosho county filed the following information (omitting caption and verification ) against Morgan K. Sipe, in the office of the clerk of the district court of that county: “And now comes J. L. Denison, county attorney of Neosho county, in the state of Kansas, who prosecutes for and on behalf of the state of Kansas, in the district court in and for said county and state, and gives the court to understand and be informed: “First Count: That heretofore, to wit, on or about the 1st day of July, 1886, the said Morgan K.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hokton, C. J.:
This was a criminal prosecution against the defendant for defiling Austa Kinne, a female under the age of eighteen years, by carnally knowing her, while she was confided to his care and protection by her parents. The record consists of 211 pages, and many errors are assigned. Unfortunately for the defendant, however, the evidence, instructions and affidavits are not embodied in a bill of exceptions. (The State v. McClintook, 37 Kas. 40; same case, 14 Pac. Rep. 511; The State v. Carr, 37 Kas. 421; same case, 15 Pac. *203Rep. 603.)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- State v. McClintockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887