Legal Opinion

Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 31, 2017No. 2016-1794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This case was argued before a panel of three judges on February 9, 2017. A sua sponte request for a poll on whether to reconsider this case was made. A poll was conducted and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service voted for sua sponte en banc consideration. '

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:(1) The panel opinion of June 23, 2017 is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated.(2) This case will be heard en banc sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 46 and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a). The court en banc shall consist of all circuit judges in regular active service who are…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nantkwest, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nantkwest, Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API