Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Naglestad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1933No. 41853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The mortgage in suit was executed by the defendants Naglestad and others to Rose Pendergast. Subsequently, Herbert and Nannie J. Renshaw, joint mortgagors, conveyed their undivided interest in the real estate to the appellee Groth by warranty deed containing the assumption clause upon which the action against him is predicated. The note and mortgage were, subsequent to the date of the warranty deed, transferred to the Savings Bank of Larchwood, Larchwood, Iowa. The appellant, superintendent of banking, is the receiver of the savings bank, which at the time of the commencement of this action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beeson v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Hanson v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Shult v. DoyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Peters v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Sheridan v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Page v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API