State v. Fay
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Buchanan District Oourt. Indictment for larceny. Trial, verdict of guilty and judgment. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Seevers, Ch. J.
i. practice: ceptions. I. The attorney general objects that the abstract fails to show any exceptions were taken to the rulings of the court below, which are relied on to reverse the judgment. It is true, the original abstract fails to shows any such exceptions, but an amended abstract has been filed which cures the alleged defect.
The original and amended abstract, taken together, show that the evidence was reduced to writing during the trial, and that the several rulings of the court touching the admission or exclusion of evidence, objected to by defendant, were also reduced…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Steen v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Duckworth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- McCarthy v. Watrous & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Hay v. FrazierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Gibbs v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.