Legal Opinion
Claim of Norcross v. Camden Central School
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 25, 2009, which ruled that liability shifted to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a.
Claimant sustained a work-related injury to her left leg and back in 2001. There were no awards for compensable lost time or wage replacement and her last documented medical treatment was in 2003. In 2008, the employer’s workers’ compensation carrier filed an RFA-2 form requesting relief from liability under Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a. Following a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Huff v. Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rebeor v. Moose Lodge 1280Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Canfora v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Cala v. PAL Envtl. Safety Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Greey v. Yaphank Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Claim of Gaddis v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Gardner v. Triple R Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.