Legal Opinion

In re Christie's Appointment

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 29, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

YANNOTTI, P.J.A.D.

Stephen M. Sweeney, in his capacity as Senate President, appeals from Governor Chris Christie’s appointment of Martin Perez as a public member of the Rutgers University Board of Governors. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the Governor’s appointment was a proper exercise of his authority under N.J.S.A. 18A:65-14.

I

The New Jersey Medical and Health Sciences Education Restructuring Act (the “Act”), was enacted on June 28, 2012, and signed by the Governor on August 22, 2012. L. 2012, c. 45, codified as N.J.S.A 18A:64M-1 to -43,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Realty Equities Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. Swede v. City of CliftonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Burns v. BelafskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. IRENE TORUNOGLU VS. ALPER TORUNOGLU (FM-12-1229-17, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  2. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION VS. YVETTE LABOSSIERE (F-013704-12, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API