Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Morton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 26, 2013PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY WECHT, J.:

Sheila Ferguson challenges the trial court’s January 4, 2013 order granting Philadelphia Cycle Center’s (“PCC”) post-trial motion seeking a new trial. Ferguson contends that the trial court erred in granting a mistrial based upon the misconduct of her counsel while presenting closing argument on behalf of Ferguson. We agree, and we reverse.

The sole issue presented concerns certain inflammatory comments by Ferguson’s attorney, Thomas More Holland, during closing arguments that the trial court found were designed to appeal to the jurors’ passions and prejudices in an effort…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brown, F. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Gregury, J. v. Greguras, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Nitardy, J. & L. v. Chabot, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Farese, L. v. Robinson, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Beltz, S. v. Ethicon Women's Health and UrologySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API